CPLR: Webinar on Sexual Harassment Against Women in the South Asia

by Christine Wu

CPLR Webinar Series on Asian Perspectives on Human Rights (II)

Sexual Harassment Against Women in Asia: A Dialogue on Gender Based Violence in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan

Women in South Asia have long been suppressed due to severe gender-based discrimination rooted in the region’s culture and religious norms. The 2012 Delhi gang rape and murder case, together with the 2017 MeToo movement ignited the fourth wave of feminism which aims to condemn the egregious sexual harassment, mistreatment and violence against women. Over the years women in South Asia have been waging movements to push their government to recognize global women’s human rights at a local level. These call into question to what extent has south Asia women’s status been improved after the social movements. It is also important to explore effective ways to narrow the gender inequality gap.

To discuss these issues, on 02 December 2021, the Public Law and Human Rights Forum (CPLR) of the School of Law of City University of Hong Kong (CityU) hosted its second webinar as part of the series on Asian perspective on Human Right to discuss gender-based violence in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. Further to address how the culture and bureaucracy in South Asia hinders women from realizing their civil and political rights as provided under international human rights.

The webinar was moderated by Dr. Fozia LONE, Associate Professor and Associate Director of the CPLR at the CityU School of Law. She started the conference by introducing the panelists which included: Dr. Saira Rahman Khan, Prof. of Law at BRAC University, in socio legal studies, a member of the Supreme Court Bar Association; Ms. Vrinda Grover, an experienced lawyer and researcher in prominent human right, founder member of Working Group on Human Rights in India and the UN (WGHR); Dr. Syed Wasif Azim, Post-Doctoral Research Fellow at the department of Political Science, University of Innsbruck.

Dr. Fozia LONE added that the purposes of today’s event was not only to critically analyses the SGBV against women but also to provide a platform to discuss this serious issue and to stand in solidarity with the survivors as well as those academics and organizations working towards advocacy of women rights protection despite the great personal risks. She thanked all panelists and participants for joining the conference.

Dr. Saira Rahman Khan focused on the situation in Bangladesh. Individuals in sexual violence crisis are seldom be able to access justice. Due to the culture of honor, most victims will keep the incident to themselves as sexual activity outside of marriage was seen as dishonor and it is legal for men to kill their wives or married daughters that shamed the family. Therefore, it is very difficult for victims to get financial and mental support to bring a lawsuit against the perpetrator.

On the other hand, technology nowadays allows perpetrators to harass and monitor individuals online. Law enforcement agencies in Bangladesh, however, lack the awareness to hold cyber stalking offenders accountable as there is no physical confront towards the victim. She highlighted the importance to have adequate statutory authority concerning internet crime. It is also indicated that a majority of victim don’t know what are the remedies available to them. The international human rights act application is largely confined to academic discussion in Bangladesh.

Ms. Vrinda Grover discussed how India state agency has dealt with the large amount of sexual violence cases in the country. The state responded by adding death penalty to rape cases. However, feminist scholars and activists oppose to this reform as in most cases the death sentence are being commuted. This will also increase the chance of victims being murdered.  She reckoned that the reform is only an excuse for the state to claim that they have already response to the demand. Although the victim’s rights are listed in statue, the government are not investing resources in enforcing the protection guaranteed. For instance, the policies to provide shelters, one stop crisis centers, and counselling service to sexual violence victims, are poorly executed.

She emphasized that the country’s prejudice against women and the dominant ideology of patriarchy is the main obstacle to attain gender equality. Punitive action alone will not improve the difficult situation women are in. Most Indians are not treating women with respect that they think women’s body integrity can be trespassed without any consequences. Only the most severe harm would be sufficed for the judiciary in India to hold the perpetrator liable. She concluded her speech by stating that in modern world women in South Asia should no longer be succumbed to gender inequalities.

Dr. Syed Wasif Azim discussed gender-based violence in Pakistan. He highlighted that only victims suffered from serious injuries seek justice from legal system. Most victims are reluctant to disclose the details of the incident to police and in court. They tend to seek help from activist and feminist organizations. Speaking of international human rights implication, most of them remain unavailable to women in Pakistan. For example, women are excluded from political aspect, seldom do women have the opportunity to be elected. He indicated that women living in the margin struggles to meet their physiological needs, not to mention pursuing other human rights regarding choice and freedom.

On behalf of the CPLR, Dr. Fozia LONE thanked all panelists and participants for contributing to the webinar.

 

 


Chinese Title
公法與人權論壇【亞洲人權視野】網絡研討會系列(II) 對亞洲女性的性騷擾:探討印度、巴基斯坦、孟加拉和阿富汗針對女性的性暴力情況
News Date
2021年12月02日
Chinese Body

 

根植於這些地區的文化和宗教規範的嚴重性別歧視令南亞婦女長期以來一直受到欺壓。2012 年德里輪姦和謀殺案以及 2017  MeToo 運動引發了第四波女權主義浪潮,旨在譴責對婦女的性騷擾、虐待和暴力行為。這些年來,南亞婦女持續發起社會運動,以推動其政府承認國際婦女的人權。社會運動之後南亞女性的地位有否改善, 有沒有其他縮小性別不平等差距的有效途徑 ,這些問題都值得我們考量。

為深入討論有關問題,香港城市大學(城大)法學院公法與人權 論壇  (CPLR) 2021  12  2 日舉辦了第二次亞洲人權視野網絡研討會,討論印度、巴基斯坦、孟加拉和阿富汗的性別岐視情況和性暴力的嚴重程度,以及南亞的文化和官僚主義如何阻礙婦女實現國際人權規定的公民和政治權利。

網絡研討會由城大法學院副教授兼 CPLR 副主任 Fozia LONE 博士主持。她首先介紹了小組成員,其中包括:Saira Rahman Khan 博士,BRAC 大學法學教授,在社會法律研究方面,是最高法院大律師協會的成員; Vrinda Grover 女士,一位經驗豐富的律師和著名人權研究員,印度和聯合國人權工作組(WGHR)的創始成員; Syed Wasif Azim 博士,因斯布魯克大學政治學系博士後研究員。

Fozia LONE 博士補充說,今天活動的目的不僅僅是分析針對女性的 SGBV,還提供了一個平台來討論這個重要的問題,與抗權者以及那些致力於倡導男女平權的學術界和組織站在一起。儘管存在巨大的個人風險,但婦女維權的重要性絕對不可忽略。她再次感謝所有小組成員參加會議。

Saira Rahman Khan 博士主要針對孟加拉的局勢進行研討。遭受性暴力的受害人很少能夠將案件訴諸司法。由於榮譽文化,大多數受害者會將這件事保密,因為婚外性行為被視為不光彩,男性甚至可以合法殺害使家庭蒙羞的妻子或已婚女兒。因此,受害人很難獲得經濟和精神上的支持來對肇事者提起訴訟。

另一方面,如今科技發達,網絡性騷擾犯罪者也隨之增加。然而,孟加拉的執法機構缺乏對此類犯罪者追究責任的意識,因為他們和受害者沒有直接接觸。她強調必需要有針對互聯網性犯罪的法例,大多數受害者不知道他們可以從哪裏獲得哪些幫助。國際人權法的應用僅限於孟加拉國的學術討論,並沒有真正幫助到該地女性。

Vrinda Grover 女士討論了印度對該國的大量性侵案件的應對方法。印度政府所採取的措施是在強奸罪的刑罰中增加死刑。然而,大多女權主義學者和維權者反對這項改革,因為在大多數情況下死刑者都會減刑。另一方面這也將增加受害者被謀殺的機會。她認為,改革只是國家聲稱已經響應訴求的藉口。儘管受害者的權利被列在法例中,但政府並沒有投入資源來執行受保障的保護。例如,為性暴力受害者提供庇護所、一站式危機中心和諮詢服務的政策皆執行不力。

她強調,該國對婦女的偏見和父權制占主導地位的意識形態是實現性別平等的主要障礙。僅僅採取懲罰措施並不能改善女性所處的困境。大多數印度人並沒有尊重女性,因為他們認為侵犯女性不會造成任何後果。只有最嚴重的侵犯案件印度的司法機關才會追究肇事者的責任。她在演講結束時指出,在現代世界中,南亞的女性不應再屈服於性別不平等。

Syed Wasif Azim 博士討論了巴基斯坦的情況。他表示只有重傷的受害者才會經司法途徑尋求正義。大多數受害者都不願向警方和法庭透露事件的細節。他們傾向於向維權者和女權主義組織尋求幫助。說到國際人權影響,巴基斯坦的婦女仍然無法獲得其中的權益。例如,女性仍被排除在政治方面之外,女性很少有被選舉的機會。他表示,生活在邊緣的女性很難滿足她們的生理需求,更不用說追求其他有關自由的人權了。

Fozia LONE 博士代表 CPLR,感謝所有小組成員和參與者為網絡研討會做出的貢獻。